[ragel-users] Bug or feature?

[Alexander Shashkevych]

Hello folks!

  I'm using ragel to parse my project configs and faced with strange ragel
behavior. Seems I've found a bug, but I'm not sure. So, use case was
following:

Input cpp file contained:

 . . .
   %%{
   write data;
   write init;
   write exec;
   }%%
. . .
   DBG_ERROR(("ConfigReader::readConfig: error opening config file '%s'!",
configFile.getBuffer() ));

DBG_ERROR is my debug macro.

After compiling this file using ragel I've found that block %%{ . . . }%%
wasn't processed by ragel and was leaved as is in destination cpp file.

When I changed '%s' to %s (without quotes) problem has gone! Seems '%s'
substring makes ragel crazy. =)

Someone faced with something like this?

*With kindest regards,*
*Alexander*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.colm.net/pipermail/ragel-users/attachments/20100819/d1cab8e7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
ragel-users at complang.org
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users