[ragel-users] Re: first of the 6.0 changes

Adrian Thurston thurs... at cs.queensu.ca
Thu Oct 4 19:30:56 UTC 2007

Yes the prefix operator I want to implement. I was planning on doing
that when other function-like syntax comes in.


Carlos Antunes wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Adrian Thurston <thurs... at cs.queensu.ca> wrote:
>> Since EOF actions can now backtrack in the input, scanners can use them to 'flush' out
>> the last token.
> Hmm, do I smell the possibility of an inline scanner here? :)
> More seriously, are you planning on implementing the "prefix' operator
> in this implementation round?
> Thanks!
> Carlos

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.colm.net/pipermail/ragel-users/attachments/20071004/2c64cd8e/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the ragel-users mailing list