[ragel-users] Re: Ruby and Java code generation

Wincent Colaiuta w... at wincent.com
Sun Sep 30 12:05:11 UTC 2007

El 28/9/2007, a las 22:04, Adrian Thurston escribió:

> Before loop breaks and variables were used in Ruby code call/cc  
> features
> were used. This was found to be very slow (about 10 times slower than
> the current). Do you think throw/catch would be any better than  
> call/cc?

Yes, if for no other reason than the fact that Ruby 1.9 won't have  


More information about the ragel-users mailing list