[ragel-users] New ragel.m4 for checking for Ragel in autoconf

Adrian Thurston adrian.thurston at esentire.com
Mon Dec 7 13:33:46 UTC 2009

I'm expecting to go up to 6.10 and beyond, but that won't happen for at 
least a year.


Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò wrote:
> Since in the side branch we're currently working on we need a newer
> version of Ragel (6.6, as 6.5 crashes on our code), I've implemented
> some basic version checking, so that a project can ask a minimum Ragel
> version it works with.
> This has one catch though: it assumes that the current scheme of x.y
> with y < 10 is kept indefinitely. For obvious reasons this might not be
> that absolute so I should probably look to solve this in a more sensible
> way.
> On the other hand it should work great on the short term, which is
> exactly what I was looking for right now.
> HTH,
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> ragel-users mailing list
> ragel-users at complang.org
> http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users

More information about the ragel-users mailing list