[ragel-users] Little-endian / big-endian (alphabetic char)

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2011/8/17  <thurston at complang.org>:
> Unfortunately, specifying certain low bits is a problem for the definition language. You end up needing to write 0 or 2 or 4 or 6 ...
>
> Underlying implementation can do it, but it's not an efficient implementation.
> High bits are easy for both language and implementation: 0 .. 127.

Thanks a lot.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>

_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
ragel-users at complang.org
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users