[ragel-users] [O] GSoC 2012 -- Elisp backend for Ragel

[Aurélien Aptel]

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Bastien <bzg at gnu.org> wrote:
>> Is it still hand written? If so, I think it's ultimately a bad idea
>> and it should be rewritten using ragel.
>
> I guess that's because you're not fluent in english, but this sounds
> a bit "peremptory".  We are not only interested in code, we are also

Sorry I've made a bad impression or if my remarks feels a bit
passive-agressive. It's harder (and longer) for me to write in
english, yes :p

> interested in learning from each others.  That's what make this list
> a nice place to live in.  If you have code or explanations you want
> to share, please do!

From my classes, I thought it was widely accepted that sufficiently
complex parsers should now be written by a tool like ragel. But again
I'm not experienced, I never had to parse a complex language.

_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
ragel-users at complang.org
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users